News Today: Follow the money: Why this supposedly 'bipartisan' caucus is actually a devious cover for big corporate interests

News Saleb-,Newspapers are usually issued daily or weekly. News Today: Follow the money: Why this supposedly 'bipartisan' caucus is actually a devious cover for big corporate interests, Magazine News weekly, but they also had a magazine format. Newspapers with common interests usually publish news articles and articles about national and international news as well as local news. These include news events and personalities of the political, business and finance, crime, weather, and natural hazards; health and medicine, science, and computers and technology; Sports; and entertainment, community, food and cuisine, apparel and home fashion, and the arts.

A wide range of materials have been published in newspapers. In addition to news,News Today: Follow the money: Why this supposedly 'bipartisan' caucus is actually a devious cover for big corporate interests ,information and opinions expressed above, including weather forecasts; Criticism and reviews Arts (including literature, film, television, theater, art, and architecture) and local services such as a restaurant; obituaries, notices of birth and graduation announcements; Entertainment features such as crossword puzzles, horoscopes, editorial cartoons, jokes, cartoons and comics; Advice column, food, and other columns; and a list of radio and television (program schedule). In the year 2017, newspapers can also provide information about new movies and TV shows available on streaming video services such as Netflix. The newspaper has been classified ad section in which people and businesses can buy a small ad to sell goods or services; In the year 2013, a large increase in internet sites to sell goods, such as Craigslist and eBay have caused ad sales are much less classified for newspapers.News Today: Follow the money: Why this supposedly 'bipartisan' caucus is actually a devious cover for big corporate interests Since 1983, it has been known mainly because of its annual report and rankings that influence in college and grad school, lies in most fields and subjects. U.s. News World Report is and academic institution is the oldest and most famous in America, [5] and covering the areas of business, law, medicine, engineering, social sciences, education and public affairs, in addition to many other areas. Print Edition] has consistently included in the list of national bestsellers, coupled with online subscriptions. Additional rankings published by U.s. News World Report and includes hospitals,News Today: Follow the money: Why this supposedly 'bipartisan' caucus is actually a devious cover for big corporate interests, medical and specialty cars.
News Today: Follow the money: Why this supposedly 'bipartisan' caucus is actually a devious cover for big corporate interests-News of the United States was founded in 1933 by David Lawrence (1888-1973), which also started the World Report in 1946. The two magazines are covering national and international news separately, but Lawrence combines them into news reports of U.S. in World and 1948 [1] and Later sold the magazine to its employees. Historically, this magazine tends to be a bit more conservative than the two main competitors, Time and Newsweek, and focus more on the story of economic, health, and education. It's also distancing news, entertainment and sports celebrities. [2] an important milestone in the history of the beginning of the magazine is including the introduction of the "Washington Whispers" column in 1934 and the column "News You Can Use" in 1952. [3] [4] in 1958, the circulation of the weekly magazine passed one million and two million in 1973. (wikipedia) News Today: Follow the money: Why this supposedly 'bipartisan' caucus is actually a devious cover for big corporate interests

They'd just as soon you forget this.

The latest rebellion that House Speaker-Designate Nancy Pelosi has had to contend with comes from the so-called "Problem Solvers" caucus, a bipartisan group which has presumably solved only one problem: deciding which members of Congress are most deserving of being pantsed in public. (It might be a tie with the Freedom Caucus. Maybe.) That the Problem Solvers are the brain child of No Labels, a creation of Nancy Jacobsen with an apparent assist from her husband Mark Penn, tells you a lot.

What tells you everything is where the money for the whole thing comes from. The Daily Beast has done the digging, and finds that the group has "encouraged financiers known for backing hyperpartisan causes to back its own super PACs." Those hyperpartisans are also the huge money behind the Republican Party, "including David Koch, former AIG head Hank Greenberg, and billionaire hedge-fund manager Paul Singer; as well as top supporters of President Donald Trump, including PayPal founder Peter Thiel, businessman Foster Friess, and Home Depot founder Ken Langone."

No wonder Trump was named one of the Problem Solvers during the presidential primaries. To be fair, they've also tried to recruit one of George Soros' political advisers, Michael Vachon, and investor Reid Hoffman, who hates Trump. Beyond them there are people like Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban and billionaire Michael Bloomberg, huge egos looking for any political movement from anywhere to give them the credibility to keep talking about them as potential presidential candidates. But they've had their real luck with the big corporate guys, the ones who really prefer Republicans to win, but will look for a few pet Democrats to give them bipartisan cover.

In the 2018 cycle, six Super PACs that are affiliated to No Labels raised more than $11 million from just 53 individuals, with an average contribution of around $124,000. So, yeah, not a particularly grassroots kind of venture there. It's not like they're trying that hard to appear bipartisan, either. Here's where Jacobsen (who also was there at the founding of Third Way, which Third Way really doesn't want you to remember) comes in. At one point in the Trumpcare fight, she turned the group's Twitter over to Penn for this gem in two parts: "The freedom caucus may overplay its hand and wind up empty handed. Perhaps their intransigence will force a bipartisan approach. The Democrats missed their chance to shape healthcare and let the Freedom Caucus be the key swing actor. Time to get off the sidelines."

Yep, there's No Labels telling Democrat they "missed their chance" when the Democratic Affordable Care Act is the thing Republicans are trying to destroy. Being the "key swing actor" in this case means playing nice with Republicans while they tear down Obamacare. All in the name of bipartisanship, of course. After that, backlash caused Jacobsen to take the Twitter keys away from Penn, but the damage was done. It didn't help matters that Jacobsen lobbied to make Pelosi the villain of the 2018 cycleand "flirted with supporting a general-election challenger to Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT) after he said something regarded as offensive about the No Labels-affiliated Problem Solvers' caucus."

There's nothing even remotely approaching principles behind Jacobsen and No Labels. It's all about raising money from big corporate interests in order to advance big corporate interests in order to somehow remain politically relevant. To that end, they're now trying to court newly-elected Utah Sen. Mitt Romney. Sounds like it's right up his alley.

But that there are Democrats currently serving in Congress (while Problem Solver Trump is in the Oval Office) who are falling for this bullshit and even willing to pick public fights with Pelosi over it is remarkable. It does however solve one more problem besides who to pants: who to primary in 2020.

 

 

Related Stories



from AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed https://ift.tt/2DZ9DdU
News Today: Follow the money: Why this supposedly 'bipartisan' caucus is actually a devious cover for big corporate interests

Title :News Today: Follow the money: Why this supposedly 'bipartisan' caucus is actually a devious cover for big corporate interests
Source :News Today: Follow the money: Why this supposedly 'bipartisan' caucus is actually a devious cover for big corporate interests

News Info:


Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+

0 komentar:

Post a Comment